Topic: Physical and Chemical Inspection
SUN Zhenwen, ZHANG Guannan, LIU Zhanfang, ZHOU Zheng, LI Guangyao, ZHENG Jili, LI Yajun, ZHU Jun
To comprehensively understand the current situation and problems of the development of trace evidence specialty in criminal technology identification organizations in China, and put forward countermeasures and suggestions, a questionnaire was designed to investigate the construction of trace evidence laboratories in China. 307 provincial, municipal, district and county-level criminal technical identification organizations that carried out physical and chemical tests in 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) were investigated with the Questionnaire Star. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed with statistical methods. The 307 criminal technology identification organizations involved in the investigation included 31 provincial, 261 municipal, and 15 district/county-level, including 121 that passed the national laboratory accreditation (CNAS) and 186 that hadn’t passed the CNAS accreditation; 304 have passed the qualification certification, and 3 haven’t passed the qualification certification. All the criminal technical institutes involved in the investigation have set up physical and chemical testing laboratories, and the vast majority (301, accounting for 98.0%) have not set up a special trace evidence department. 224 organizations carried out the examination of trace evidence, accounting for 73.2%. There are 1 463 technicians in 307 laboratories, with an average of 4.77 in each laboratory. The professional and technical personnel are mainly chemical and related majors, accounting for 65.0%. GC-MS and GC are the most commonly used physical and chemical analysis instruments, with 409 and 3 457 sets respectively. The common analysis equipment for trace evidence specialty, such as scanning electron micro-scope/energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS, 63 sets) and infrared spectrometer (IR, 117 sets), account for a relatively small proportion. Accelerants and fire residues, explosives and post-blast residues, paints, gunshot residues and fibers are the most commonly encountered evidence. The training of professional and technical personnel is the most important factor restricting the development of the trace evidence specialty. Research has found that there are some problems in the development of the trace evidence specialty in China, including the weak awareness of the discovery, collection and application of trace evidence, the relatively backward laboratory equipment, the imperfect technical system of trace evidence examination, and the relatively lagging information system construction. The trace evidence laboratory has entered the stage of comprehensive construction in China. The development of trace evidence specialty in China can be promoted by clarifying the professional boundaries of trace evidence, building regional trace evidence laboratories, improving the technical method system of trace evidence, strengthening technical exchanges, training and promotion, and strengthening the training of trace evidence professionals.