Cooperative Relationship and Keyword Evolution Revealed from Knowledge Graph Entwining about Trace Evidence

LI Guangyao, HUANG Xing, SUN Zhenwen, ZHU Jun, QIAO Ting, WANG Ping, ZHOU Zheng, ZHENG Jili, ZHOU Zhiyu

Forensic Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 302-309. DOI: 10.16467/j.1008-3650.2021.0171
Reviews

Cooperative Relationship and Keyword Evolution Revealed from Knowledge Graph Entwining about Trace Evidence

  • LI Guangyao1, HUANG Xing1, SUN Zhenwen1, ZHU Jun1,*, QIAO Ting1, WANG Ping1, ZHOU Zheng1, ZHENG Jili1, ZHOU Zhiyu2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Driven by big data and visualization technologies, knowledge graph has been rapidly developed about its theory and methods in recent years, therewith having provided a new way to understand the realm of knowledge. The knowledge graph can directly reveal the characteristics and principles of scientific activities. Here, VOSviewer, a tool for knowledge graph to map and parse, was adopted to analyze the large quantity of literatures relating to trace evidence from Web of Science. The results were derived from the main countries, institutions and authors who had contributed more publications about trace evidence worldwide. Meanwhile, there was a manifest of both the characteristics and evolution trend of keywords about trace evidence in different periods. Consequently, this survey brought forth a quick way to know the institutions/countries and authors who had published more articles of researches about trace evidence, together with a comprehension being learnt into their partnership and cooperation. Besides, such a survey can help grasp the research hotspots and developing trends of trace evidence. Certainly, an informative reference could be also provided for communication and learning among relevant peers in the field of trace evidence through a survey of the kind.

Key words

trace evidence / knowledge graph / concurrence analysis / evolution / literature

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Guangyao, HUANG Xing, SUN Zhenwen, ZHU Jun, QIAO Ting, WANG Ping, ZHOU Zheng, ZHENG Jili, ZHOU Zhiyu. Cooperative Relationship and Keyword Evolution Revealed from Knowledge Graph Entwining about Trace Evidence. Forensic Science and Technology. 2022, 47(3): 302-309 https://doi.org/10.16467/j.1008-3650.2021.0171

References

[1] 朱军,梅宏成,胡灿,等. 微量物证的发展现状和趋势[C]//第七届全国微量物证检验及应用技术学术交流会论文汇编. 北京:群众出版社,2016.
(ZHU Jun, MEI Hongcheng, HU Can, et al.Development status and trend of trace evidence[C]// Proceedings of the 7th National Symposium on Trace Evidence Inspection and Application Technology. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2016.)
[2] 付健,丁敬达. Citespace和VOSviewer软件的可视化原理比较[J]. 农业图书情报,2019, 31(10): 31-37.
(FU Jian, DING Jingda.Comparison of visualization principles between CiteSpace and Vosviewer[J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(10): 31-37.)
[3] BULL P A, MORGAN R M.Sediment fingerprints: a forensic technique using quartz-sand grains[J]. Science and Justice, 2007, 47(1): 34-36.
[4] MORGAN R M, DAVIES G, BULL P A.The recovery of pollen evidence from documents and its forensic implications[J]. Science and Justice, 2013, 53(4): 375-384.
[5] MORGAN R M, ALLEN E, KING T, et al.The spatial and temporal distribution of pollen in a room: forensic implications[J]. Science and Justice, 2014, 54(1): 49-56.
[6] KONOPINSKI D I, HUDZIAK S, MORGAN R M, et al.Investigation of quartz-grain surface textures by atomic force microscopy for forensic analysis[J]. Forensic Science International, 2012, 223(1-3): 245-255.
[7] MORGAN R M, BULL P A.The use of grain size distribution analysis of sediments and soils in forensic enquiry[J]. Science and Justice Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 2007, 47(3):125-135.
[8] BULL P A, MORGAN R M, SAGOVSKY A, et al.The transfer and persistence of trace particulates: experimental studies using clothing fabrics[J]. Science and Justice, 2006, 46(3): 185-195.
[9] GHERGHE S, MORGAN R M, ARREBOLA-LIÉBANAS J, et al. Persistence of transferred fragrance on fabrics for forensic reconstruction applications[J]. Science and Justice, 2020, 60(1): 53-62.
[10] GHERGHE S, MORGAN R M, ARREBOLA-LIÉBANAS J, et al. Fragrance transfer between fabrics for forensic reconstruction applications[J]. Science and Justice, 2018, 59(3): 256-267.
[11] GHERGHE S, MORGAN R M, ARREBOLA-LIÉBANAS J, et al. Development of a HS-SPME/GC-MS method for the analysis of volatile organic compounds from fabrics for forensic reconstruction applications[J]. Forensic Science International, 2018, 290: 207-218.
[12] PALENIK S.Microscopic trace evidence: the overlooked clue[J/OL]. [2021-02-24].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265238331.
[13] PETRACO N.The occurrence of trace evidence in one examiner’s casework[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1985, 30(2): 485-493.
[14] LAPOSATA E A.Collection of trace evidence from bombing victims at autopsy[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1985, 30(3): 789-797.
[15] PETRACO N, DE FOREST P R. Trajectory reconstructions I: trace evidence in flight[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1990, 35(6): 1284.
[16] FARMER N, MEIER-AUGENSTEIN W, LUCY D.Stable isotope analysis of white paints and likelihood ratios[J]. Science and Justice, 2009, 49(2): 114-119.
[17] TURILLAZZI E, MONACI F, NERI M, et al.Collection of trace evidence of explosive residues from the skin in a death due to a disguised letter bomb - the synergy between confocal laser scanning microscope and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer analyses[J]. Forensic Science International, 2010, 197(1-3): e7-e12.
[18] MEHLTRETTER A H, BRADLEY M J, WRIGHT D M.Analysis and discrimination of electrical tapes: part I. Adhesives[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 56(1): 82-94.
[19] AITKEN C G G, LUCY D. Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2010, 53(1): 109-122.
[20] KOONS R D, BUSCAGLIA J.Interpretation of glass composition measurements: the effects of match criteria on discrimination capability[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2002, 47(3): 505.
[21] MAURI M, DIBBANTI M K, CALZAVARA M, et al.Time domain nuclear magnetic resonance: a key complementary technique for the forensic differentiation of foam traces[J]. Analytical Methods, 2013, 5(17): 4336-4344.
[22] SMIJS T, GALLI F, VAN ASTEN A.Forensic potential of atomic force microscopy[J]. Forensic Chemistry, 2016, 2: 93-104.
[23] STAROVOITOVA V N, SEGEBADE C.Photon activation analysis as a tool for evidentiary sample identification: a feasibility study[J]. Journal of Radio-analytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2017, 311: 611-615.
[24] BLACK O, CODY R, EDWARDS D, et al.Identification of polymers and organic gunshot residue in evidence from 3D-printed firearms using DART-mass spectrometry: a feasibility study[J]. Forensic Chemistry, 2017, 5: 26-32.
[25] BUCKNELL A, BASSINDALE T.An investigation into the effect of surveillance drones on textile evidence at crime scenes[J]. Science and Justice, 2017, 57(5): 373-375.
[26] JONES Z V, GWINNETT C, JACKSON A R W. The effect of tape type, taping method and tape storage temperature on the retrieval rate of fibers from various surfaces: an example of data generation and analysis to facilitate trace evidence recovery validation and optimization[J]. Science and Justice, 2019, 59(3): 268-291.
[27] PIRRIE D, PIRRIE A R.Composition and abundance of particles present on “power-free” examination gloves[J]. Forensic Science International, 2017, 279: 148-156.

50

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/