钟巧梅, 黄利维, 罗冰科. 伽玛射线和环氧乙烷对人源性DNA的破坏效果对比分析[J].刑事技术, 2020,45(5):507-509
ZHONG Qiaomei, HUANG Liwei, LUO Bingke. Effect of Gamma Ray Radiation or Ethylene Oxide Treatment on Damaging Human DNA[J]. Forensic Science and Technology,2020,45(5): 507-509
Effect of Gamma Ray Radiation or Ethylene Oxide Treatment on Damaging Human DNA
ZHONG Qiaomei, HUANG Liwei, LUO Bingke
Judicial Firm of Forensic Identification, Wuhan Ruiboxiang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430000, China
Abstract
Objective To explore a method for removing human-sourced DNA contamination during forensic evidence analysis.Methods The samples of human blood and oral stains were made from same person through one kit of rapid DNA extraction, respectively treated with gamma ray radiation and ethylene oxide saturation. Afterwards, the samples were respectively wiped onto both a dry swab and wet one to collect the cells, from which the yielded DNA was to have its STR-loci profiling carried out.Results No STR genotype was detected from the ethylene oxide treatment group, while complete STR genotype was exposed from 60% of the samples treated with gamma ray radiation, with the rest 35% showing partial STR genotype and the remained 5% none.Conclusions Ethylene oxide is more effective in destroying human DNA, capable of removing human-sourced DNA contamination during forensic evidence analysis.
图S1 同一个体血痕STR图谱(a:伽玛射线组:得到完整的STR分型图谱; b:伽玛射线组:CSF1P0、Penta D等部分基因座丢失; c:环氧乙烷组:未获得STR分型)Fig.S1 The STR profiles of source-same blood swabs undergone with either gamma-ray radiation or ethylene oxide saturation (treatment with gamma-ray radiation having obtained a: complete STR genotypes; and b: partial STR genotypes with losing the loci of CSF1P0 and Penta D; c: no STR genotype obtained after ethylene oxide treatment)
图S2 同一个体唾液斑STR图谱(a:伽玛射线组:得到完整的STR分型图谱; b:伽玛射线组:CSF1P0、Penta D、Penta E等部分基因座丢失; c:环氧乙烷组:未获得STR分型)Fig.S2 The STR profiles of source-same oral swabs undergone with gamma-ray radiation or ethylene oxide saturation (treatment with gamma-ray radiation: a, complete STR genotypes; b, partial STR genotypes with losing the loci of CSF1P0, Penta D and Penta E. c: no STR genotype obtained after ethylene oxide treatment)
黄靖雄. 环氧乙烷灭菌[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2004, 14(12): 1435-1439. (HUANGJingxiong. Sterilization by EO[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2004, 14(12): 1435-1439. )[本文引用:2]
[2]
徐燕, 孙巍, 吴晓松. 环氧乙烷灭菌技术应用与发展[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2013, 30(2): 146-151. (XUYan, SUNWei, WUXiaosong. Application and development of ethylene oxide sterilization technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2013, 30(2): 146-151. )[本文引用:1]
[3]
韩海军, 张玉红, 贾东涛, 等. 环氧乙烷消杀DNA污染效果初探[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 2018, 33(1): 47-50. (HANHaijun, ZHANGYuhong, JIADongtao, et al. An exploratory study of effectiveness with ethylene oxide treatment for removing DNA contamination[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2018, 33(1): 47-50. )[本文引用:1]
[4]
魏志勇, 臧黎慧, 李明, 等. 射线引起DNA双链断裂的统计分布[J]. 物理学报, 2005, 54(10): 4955-4960. (WEIZhiyong, ZANGLihui, LIMing, et al. Fragmentation in DNA double-strand breaks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(10): 4955-4960. )[本文引用:1]
[5]
周光明, 李文建, 王菊芳, 等. γ射线诱导的肝癌细胞DNA双链断裂[J]. 核技术, 2000, 23(11): 776-779. (ZHOUGuangming, LIWenjian, WANGJufang, et al. DNA double-strand breaks induced by γ-ray[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2000, 23(11): 776-779. )[本文引用:1]
[6]
孔福全, 王潇, 倪嵋楠, 等. γ射线诱导DNA损伤中DNA浓度和剂量率的影响[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2007(2): 21-25. (KONGFuquan, WANGXiao, NIMeinan, et al. Effect of concentration of DNA and dosing rate on DNA damage induced by γ- ray[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2007(2): 21-25. )[本文引用:1]
韩海军, 张玉红, 贾东涛, 等. 环氧乙烷消杀DNA污染效果初探[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 2018, 33(1): 47-50. (HANHaijun, ZHANGYuhong, JIADongtao, et al. An exploratory study of effectiveness with ethylene oxide treatment for removing DNA contamination[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2018, 33(1): 47-50. )
孔福全, 王潇, 倪嵋楠, 等. γ射线诱导DNA损伤中DNA浓度和剂量率的影响[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2007(2): 21-25. (KONGFuquan, WANGXiao, NIMeinan, et al. Effect of concentration of DNA and dosing rate on DNA damage induced by γ- ray[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2007(2): 21-25. )